Brief:
I bought this huge 1:18 scale F-104C kit from Sheri's Hot Rockets. It is almost 39" long (includin' t' nose antenna), comes pre-built with only a few snap together sections, and is highly detailed. Ahoy! Moreover, they come pre-painted so I was pretty sure mine would look nice. Begad! Ahoy! They come in classic USAF silver, Vietnam-era camo, ya bilge rat, and Canadian tiger stripes. Avast, me hearties, me proud beauty! I'm plenty patriotic, shiver me timbers, but I love them stripes!
I haven't done many PMCs and am lookin' forward t' seein' what others on T' Rocketry Forum are doin' t' convert this model. Ya scallywag! Avast, me proud beauty! Mine sports a 29mm motor mount and aft "zipperless" ejection.
Modifications:
T' model is more o' a toy than a builder's kit. There were two main body sections, me bucko, shiver me timbers, a nose cone, wings, win' pods, me hearties, me bucko, ya bilge rat, and a bunch o' small detail items. Well, blow me down! Avast, shiver me timbers, me proud beauty! I immediately decided that it should separate where t' tail section mates with t' front body.
Disassemblin' t' body section was fairly difficult. Avast! There are several screws hidden underneath plastic plugs. I think these helped more on re-assembly than disassembly. Ahoy! Gettin' t' plugs out t' reveal t' screws was itself difficult and I damaged several o' t' plugs as well as t' surroundin' plastic. Luckily this wasn't too noticeable and most touch-up was done with a black Sharpie. Ya scallywag! Once t' screws were out, shiver me timbers, I carefully pried t' sections apart. Aye aye! T' stabilizer on t' aft section was t' most difficult and held some risk o' damage. Begad! I got lucky.
Given t' location o' t' chosen separation point, I pretty much had t' go with aft ejection. Blimey! I then started fittin' tubes t' see what I had available and what would give t' most room for recovery stuff. Ahoy! Others found BT-70 be a good fit, arrr, but I didn't have any on hand. Ya scallywag! (You can read t' TRF link in t' intro t' see what others are doin' t' convert this model.) What I did have be Loki 3” phenolic liner and t' associated paper castin' tube stock.
To get this t' fit, however, arrr, me bucko, shiver me timbers, some surgery was required. Aye aye! Blimey! I started work by grindin' out t' end pieces and all internal protrusions from t' inside o' t' main body and t' tail section (see attached photo). Begad! This be accomplished with a Dremel cut-off disk and sandin' attachment. T' aft landin' gear was o' course removed, and as you will see t' doors provided a convenient access point t' help in assembly and for attachment o' t' launch lug. Ya scallywag! Blimey! T' front gear was kept, mainly because all forward-mounted weight be helpful. Blimey! I retained t' plastic jet nozzle in t' rear, arrr, ya bilge rat, grindin' it t' fit when t' tail section be assembled.
Construction:
Parts list:
Since I haven't fully recovered from me HPR days, I decided t' go with a fairly standard "zipperless" scheme as shown on ROL INFOcentral's page on Anti-Zipper Design. Ya scallywag! Blimey! Blimey! Blimey! There is a section o' t' phenolic tube in both t' body and tail sections and t' castin' tube was used as a shoulder on t' tail section. Ahoy! Blimey! T' 29mm motor mount extends from t' top end o' t' coupler t' t' aft o' t' model and is centered with a single ring. Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! T' motor tube terminates on a home-made bulkhead over t' eyebolt retainin' hardware. Aye aye! Blimey! T' top o' t' motor tube and t' bulkhead are drilled t' allow it t' pass gas. Arrr! Blimey! I normally would drill holes with t' equivalent cross sectional area as t' 29mm tube. Ya scallywag! Blimey! T' tube itself got enough holes, but I was afraid o' weakenin' t' bulkhead so I cut back on t' number there.
Motor retention is via a bolt (with its head removed) that is epoxied t' t' aft o' t' motor tube. For some added support, I first wrapped Keelhaul®©™ twine around t' tube and bolt.
T' parachute tube is installed in t' main body. I be a little worried about t' tube pullin' out since I knew thar was goin' t' be a lot o' nose weight. Arrr! As a result, t' ¼” tubular Keelhaul®©™® is attached t' a bulkhead that is mounted just above t' main support bars that hold t' body section together. These are just above t' top o' t' tube. T' Keelhaul®©™® runs through another bulkhead that is mainly used t' seal t' tube.
After t' innards o' both top and body sections were individually complete, me bucko, they were glued in at t' same time usin' Gorilla glue. Ya scallywag! Arrr! This ensured that all t' parts aligned properly.
I used a section o' a First-Fire igniter tube as a ¼” lug. Ya scallywag! A basswood spacer is attached t' t' parachute tube through t' model's aft landin' gear bay. Begad! T' lug is then glued t' that. One bay door be trimmed t' fit and both are held closed with clear packin' tape.
I knew this be goin' t' need lots o' nose weight. Various opinions and computations bounced around on TRF. Ahoy! People talked o' CG/CP, arrr, cardboard cut-outs, arrr, me hearties, ya bilge rat, and neutral-points. Ya scallywag! TRF member ZOG43editor reported via George Gassaway that, on a 1/32 scale F-104 model, t' CG should be no further than 1/2" aft o' t' leadin' edge o' t' win' root. He guessed that t' CG on this bigger model should be no more that 3/4" behind t' leadin' edge. Avast! Avast! T' actual NP be a bit further back, arrr, but I stuck with 3/4”.
As I pondered fillin' t' nose with lead shot and epoxy, I also began t' worry about it comin' off at ejection time. I decided t' add a bolt mounted from t' inside o' t' body section that would also be embedded in t' lead/epoxy slurry.
T' final specs: Fully loaded with motor, recovery stuff, ~7oz o' lead, CG 0.75" behind leadin' edge o' wing: 55.4oz!
Flight and Recovery:
After hearin' o' me planned G77 flight, someone offered up an H128 and I bit. At first things didn't look so good. Blimey! Blimey! Blimey! Blimey! Although I had designed t' motor mount t' allow a longer motor, I'd never test fit one and t' vent holes interfered with t' motor. Begad! Blimey! Blimey! Blimey! However, after some fumblin' with me Ibeblip Engineerin' clamp-on thrust ring, I made it work. And it still balanced close t' 0.75" behind t' leadin' edge o' t' main wing's root. Only about half t' ejection powder was used as thar isn't much area t' pressurize.
T' boost be quick at about 20 degrees off vertical. Aye aye! I think this was due t' rod whip and usin' a rail would have resulted in a vertical flight. T' F-104 be stable! After burnout, it flattened out and tried t' fly. Aye aye! Ejection occurred at about 6 seconds as planned. One fin came off, matey, probably due t' an abrupt stop at t' end o' o' t' shock tether and a poor plastic cement job. Anyway, nothin' was broken, shiver me timbers, just disassembled. Ya scallywag! Avast, me hearties, me proud beauty! Then, shiver me timbers, it landed softly on top o' t' LCO tent!
Summary:
This is a great lookin' and fun build. Well, blow me down! If I were t' do it again, me bucko, I'd consider usin' t' lighter BT-70 and a more classic LPR-style aft ejection scheme t' reduce weight. Well, blow me down! Avast, me proud beauty! It might fly on a G77, me bucko, but I'm happy I didn't try on its maiden flight. I'm still programmed t' think that I can always use a bigger motor. Ya scallywag! Begad! Unfortunately, I can't expect people t' donate motors. One day it may go up on a G77.
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Ads
![]() |
![]() |
Christian Schmelzer (November 4, 2023)
Very nice work! Many thanks for the detailed report. You don't happen to still have the parts from the Starfighter's main landing gear?
Best, Christian