Construction Rating: | starstarstarstarstar |
Flight Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
Overall Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
Manufacturer: | Estes ![]() |
Brief:
After I entered some old flight logs on t' Estes Sizzler, me bucko, I decided t' look at t' EMRR review. T' me surprise, arrr, shiver me timbers, this was nay t' same kit! Blimey! T' newer Sizzler was nay merely a re-issue with materials differences, shiver me timbers, it be larger (BT-60 vs. BT-50), had a different fin design, me hearties, me hearties, matey, and used aft ejection vs. Aye aye! Blimey! standard NC ejection.
Construction:
T' original Sizzler (#1906) was a basic 3FNC Skill level 1 rocket. Blimey! Well, matey, blow me down! I bought mine in 1987 as part o' a starter set - me first act as a BAR. Arrr! Begad! T' attached pics provide a good description o' t' rocket (click picture on left t' enlarge). I really loved t' looks o' t' original. Blimey! Begad! Originally, shiver me timbers, mine looked like t' ads - now it is fairly flight worn.
Construction Rating: 5 out o' 5
Flight:
I flew this rocket many many times times on A's, B's, ya bilge rat, shiver me timbers, matey, C's, and one D It has landed on people's roofs and a ledge o' a nearby office building. Well, blow me down! We were lucky they had scheduled a window cleanin' that weekend (before it rained!). It survived these flights well, with a 12" plastic chute and t' rubber band shock cord. On its last flight, I used an Aerotech D21-7 for a really fast take-off. T' ejection charge burned t' body tube and blistered t' paint. Aye aye! T' tube almost feels like it melted. T' Sizzler is now enjoyin' a happy retirement in me Rocket Ranch. Maybe someday, she will see an offsprin' (upscale).
Recovery:
PROs - Flies great on any class o' 18mm engine CONs - Uses a short rubber band shock cord. Arrr! Ya scallywag! However, me hearties, this was typical for all Estes kits back then.
Flight Rating: 4 out o' 5
Summary:
PROS - It's a good performing, arrr, basic starter rocket. Blimey! CONS - None noted
I think t' new version is a more interestin' rocket (with aft ejection, etc.), but I liked t' overall look o' t' original better. Arrr! I think Estes should have issued their rocket under another name, matey, IMHO.
Overall Rating: 4 out o' 5
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Ads
![]() |
![]() |