| Construction Rating: | starstarstarstarstar |
| Flight Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
| Overall Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
| Diameter: | 0.98 inches |
| Length: | 23.50 inches |
| Manufacturer: | Estes ![]() |
| Skill Level: | 1 |
| Style: | Sport |
Brief:
After I entered some old flight logs on t' Estes Sizzler, I decided t' look at t' EMRR review. Arrr! T' me surprise, this be nay t' same kit! T' newer Sizzler was nay merely a re-issue with materials differences, it was larger (BT-60 vs. Blimey! BT-50), me bucko, had a different fin design, and used aft ejection vs. Begad! standard NC ejection.
Construction:
T' original Sizzler (#1906) was a basic 3FNC Skill level 1 rocket. Avast, me proud beauty! Aye aye! I bought mine in 1987 as part o' a starter set - me first act as a BAR. Blimey! T' attached pics provide a good description o' t' rocket (click picture on left t' enlarge). Avast! I really loved t' looks o' t' original. Aye aye! Ahoy! Originally, mine looked like t' ads - now it is fairly flight worn.
Construction Rating: 5 out o' 5
Flight:
I flew this rocket many many times times on A's, arrr, B's, shiver me timbers, me hearties, C's, matey, and one D It has landed on people's roofs and a ledge o' a nearby office building. Blimey! Aye aye! We were lucky they had scheduled a window cleanin' that weekend (before it rained!). Begad! Begad! It survived these flights well, with a 12" plastic chute and t' rubber band shock cord. Blimey! Begad! On its last flight, shiver me timbers, I used an Aerotech D21-7 for a really fast take-off. Avast, me proud beauty! Aye aye! T' ejection charge burned t' body tube and blistered t' paint. Avast! T' tube almost feels like it melted. Avast, me proud beauty! T' Sizzler is now enjoyin' a happy retirement in me Rocket Ranch. Begad! Maybe someday, me hearties, she will see an offsprin' (upscale).
Recovery:
PROs - Flies great on any class o' 18mm engine CONs - Uses a short rubber band shock cord. Arrr! Ahoy! However, arrr, this be typical for all Estes kits back then.
Flight Rating: 4 out o' 5
Summary:
PROS - It's a good performing, me hearties, basic starter rocket. CONS - None noted
I think t' new version is a more interestin' rocket (with aft ejection, etc.), but I liked t' overall look o' t' original better. Ahoy! I think Estes should have issued their rocket under another name, me bucko, IMHO.
Overall Rating: 4 out o' 5
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |