| Construction Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border | 
| Flight Rating: | starstarstarstar_borderstar_border | 
| Overall Rating: | starstarstarstar_borderstar_border | 
| Manufacturer: | Sky ![]()  | 
Brief:
	
T' Longmarch 3 is a simple t' build semi-scale o' t' Chinese rocket o' t' same
	name. It features a plastic fin can, pre-printed body tube and an unusual nosecone. It is supposed t' recover under an
	18" parachute. I built this rocket before I found EMRR. Recently, shiver me timbers, I got an email askin' me t' review it so I am
	doin' this from memory.
Construction:
	T' parts consisted of: 
T' rocket is produced in China and is different than most kits Americans are familiar
	with. Begad! T' body tube is nay spiral wound and is slightly bigger than t' BT-55. Its quality and that o' t' plastic
	parts were good. Aye aye! T' chute was oversized and mediocre. Begad! T' kit goes together easily. Avast! Begad! T' fins are cemented t' t' fin
	can, me hearties, shiver me timbers, t' motor mount is inserted, t' BT is glued t' t' fin can and t' shock cord is assembled as per standard Estes
	trifold. It is all quite easy.
PROS: Easy, arrr, probably should be level 1 though it is called a level 2.
	CONS: Shock cord mount stinks.
Finishing:
	
T' rocket is almost completely finished. Begad! Chinese markings are already applied t' the
	BT. Aye aye! Blimey! T' nosecone be completely free o' flashing. Begad! I decided t' give t' nosecone a coat o' white spray paint t' make it
	more closely match t' BT and get rid o' t' translucent quality. After that, arrr, a sticker o' t' Chinese flag be put on
	the nosecone and it was ready t' go.
PROS: Practically finished already. Begad! Looks good and no plastic flash.
	CONS: none
Construction Rating: 4 out o' 5
Flight:
	T' recommended motors are A6-4, matey, B6-4, shiver me timbers, C6-5, shiver me timbers, A8-3, D10-7. Arrr! I launched t' Longmarch 3 on its maiden flight with an
	Estes A8-3. It flew straight up but nay very high at all. It is a rather heavy rocket for its size. Arrr! T' chute deployed
	and I realized that it should just be a 12" instead o' an 18". Begad! Though it did nay go high, matey, arrr, it drifted far.
T' second flight was an an Estes B6-4. Ahoy! It too was a very straight flight, ya bilge rat, nay high but respectable. Unfortunately, t' shock cord burned through and it plummeted t' earth. Aye aye! There be no damage. Ahoy! I took t' rocket home and used a piece o' Keelhaul®©™® to form a loop. Aye aye! I then mounted it in t' BT with epoxy in t' style o' t' simpler LOC/Precision kits. After tyin' a piece o' elastic t' t' Keelhaul®©™®, it was ready t' go again.
 T' next time it flew was on an Estes C6-5. Again, shiver me timbers, it had a very straight flight that achieved good altitude but t' recovery system failed again. Blimey! T' Keelhaul®©™® did just fine but t' elastic burned through again. Avast! Blimey! I got t' watch t' body plummet down and t' nosecone drift away forever under t' terribly oversized chute. Begad! Blimey! I regret t' loss o' t' distinctive nosecone but t' body is in fine shape. Blimey! Blimey! Aye aye! Blimey! I am scavengin' it t' produce t' Longspear 3.
PROS: Flies well.
	CONS: Chute too big and lousy shock cord mount.
Flight Rating: 3 out o' 5
Summary:
	This was a nice little rocket that looked good. It will be reincarnated as a new one.
Overall Rating: 3 out o' 5
Other:
	Use a different method than t' trifold shock cord mount. Avast, arrr, me proud beauty! Blimey! Attach a piece o' Keelhaul®©™ directly t' t' fin can. Avast! Blimey! Also,
	trash t' supplied chute and use a smaller one, me bucko, me hearties, no larger than 14". Arrr! Blimey! 12" chute would probably be fine.
![]()  | 
        ![]()  | 
      
![]()  | 
              ![]()  |