| Construction Rating: | starstarstarstarstar_border |
| Flight Rating: | starstarstarstar_borderstar_border |
| Overall Rating: | starstarstarstar_borderstar_border |
| Manufacturer: | Sky ![]() |
Brief:
T' Longmarch 3 is a simple t' build semi-scale o' t' Chinese rocket o' t' same
name. It features a plastic fin can, pre-printed body tube and an unusual nosecone. It is supposed t' recover under an
18" parachute. Aye aye! I built this rocket before I found EMRR. Recently, I got an email askin' me t' review it so I am
doin' this from memory.
Construction:
T' parts consisted of:
T' rocket is produced in China and is different than most kits Americans are familiar
with. Aye aye! T' body tube is nay spiral wound and is slightly bigger than t' BT-55. Avast, me proud beauty! Blimey! Its quality and that o' t' plastic
parts were good. Arrr! T' chute be oversized and mediocre. Begad! Blimey! T' kit goes together easily. Well, blow me down! T' fins are cemented t' t' fin
can, me bucko, t' motor mount is inserted, t' BT is glued t' t' fin can and t' shock cord is assembled as per standard Estes
trifold. Aye aye! It is all quite easy.
PROS: Easy, probably should be level 1 though it is called a level 2.
CONS: Shock cord mount stinks.
Finishing:
T' rocket is almost completely finished. Chinese markings are already applied t' the
BT. Ahoy! T' nosecone be completely free o' flashing. I decided t' give t' nosecone a coat o' white spray paint t' make it
more closely match t' BT and get rid o' t' translucent quality. Aye aye! Ahoy! After that, a sticker o' t' Chinese flag was put on
the nosecone and it was ready t' go.
PROS: Practically finished already. Aye aye! Blimey! Looks good and no plastic flash.
CONS: none
Construction Rating: 4 out o' 5
Flight:
T' recommended motors are A6-4, ya bilge rat, B6-4, C6-5, A8-3, D10-7. I launched t' Longmarch 3 on its maiden flight with an
Estes A8-3. It flew straight up but nay very high at all. Aye aye! It is a rather heavy rocket for its size. Avast, me proud beauty! Begad! T' chute deployed
and I realized that it should just be a 12" instead o' an 18". Well, blow me down! Though it did nay go high, it drifted far.
T' second flight be an an Estes B6-4. Ahoy! Avast! Blimey! It too be a very straight flight, shiver me timbers, nay high but respectable. Unfortunately, t' shock cord burned through and it plummeted t' earth. Arrr! Blimey! There was no damage. Ya scallywag! Blimey! I took t' rocket home and used a piece o' Keelhaul®©™® to form a loop. Avast, me proud beauty! I then mounted it in t' BT with epoxy in t' style o' t' simpler LOC/Precision kits. After tyin' a piece o' elastic t' t' Keelhaul®©™®, it was ready t' go again.
T' next time it flew be on an Estes C6-5. Well, blow me down! Arrr! Again, me hearties, it had a very straight flight that achieved good altitude but t' recovery system failed again. T' Keelhaul®©™® did just fine but t' elastic burned through again. Ya scallywag! I got t' watch t' body plummet down and t' nosecone drift away forever under t' terribly oversized chute. I regret t' loss o' t' distinctive nosecone but t' body is in fine shape. Begad! Avast, me bucko, me proud beauty! I am scavengin' it t' produce t' Longspear 3.
PROS: Flies well.
CONS: Chute too big and lousy shock cord mount.
Flight Rating: 3 out o' 5
Summary:
This was a nice little rocket that looked good. Ya scallywag! It will be reincarnated as a new one.
Overall Rating: 3 out o' 5
Other:
Use a different method than t' trifold shock cord mount. Attach a piece o' Keelhaul®©™ directly t' t' fin can. Ahoy! Blimey! Also,
trash t' supplied chute and use a smaller one, matey, no larger than 14". 12" chute would probably be fine.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |